Best Practices

Launching New Safety Policies in a Few Hours... Instead of Months

The trust and safety industry has long faced an impossible choice: scale or nuance. Previously, platforms relied on blunt enforcement tools that couldn't account for context, resulting in poor enforcement and worse customer experiences. Each update required drafting rules, training moderators, testing accuracy, and waiting for deployment. By the time a policy went live, the risks had often changed.

Moving from an “Or” to an “And”

LLMs have collapsed that timeline, enabling trust and safety teams to not just scale nuanced decision-making but increase consistency, speed, and contextual understanding at scale. What once took months of manual coordination across teams can now happen in hours. This shift marks the start of a new era in policy development, where teams can respond to emerging risks faster and with greater precision.

Moderators struggle with distinguishing “realistic” from “unrealistic” firearms. Both of these are Star Wars cosplay guns. Not modeled after a real weapon.

The Historical Challenge: Why Traditional Policy Enforcement Falls Short

Traditional policy enforcement relied on keyword-based controls that were quick to deploy but failed when context mattered. When keyword accuracy was low, these systems sent large volumes of content to human review. The result: response times slowed, operational costs increased, and risks went unaddressed.

What Makes SafetyKit Moderation Different

SafetyKit integrates LLMs into production workflows - enabling accurate detection and automation. Teams maintain control over outcomes while improving enforcement efficiency.

1. Accuracy and Contextual Understanding

LLMs enable consistent, context-aware enforcement decisions that go beyond keyword-based systems. SafetyKit builds on this capability to apply policies with precision across diverse content.Models can distinguish similar-looking cases with different policy implications. For example, identifying luxury goods by design features even when brand names or logos are hidden.Accuracy is maintained through continuous evaluation against policy “golden sets,” with rapid updates to align model behavior to policy intent. As precision improves, teams can automate low-risk decisions confidently while reserving human review for complex cases.

Humans struggle with identifying real from fake products at the rate that marketplaces demand. LLMs can.

2. Policy Expertise

SafetyKit models translate written policies into consistent enforcement decisions and manage exceptions across rule sets. They interpret complex policy language directly, allowing enforcement systems to apply context that decision trees or keyword rules cannot capture.Policies differ by market, region, and regulation. SafetyKit enables teams to integrate these variations into one system, ensuring the correct regional version of a policy is applied automatically during detection.Policy performance is monitored using golden sets and sample content. Edge cases or misclassifications are corrected within 24 hours to keep enforcement aligned with policy intent.This level of policy consistency supports scalable automation, where clearly defined rules can be enforced directly without manual review.

3. Multi-Modal Precision

SafetyKit supports LLMs with vision capabilities, enabling detection across text, images, and video for broader policy enforcement.

Product safety models can identify hazards in both listing text and visual content, catching risks that legacy systems miss. For example, a product might look safe in images but reveal small detachable parts in a video that pose a choking hazard. LLM-powered tools can analyze this video content at scale and make more informed safety decisions.

Multi-modal coverage reduces the volume of manual review by capturing violations automatically across content types, improving both speed and consistency of enforcement.

Reinventing Policy Development with LLMs

LLM-powered systems have turned policy development from a months-long process into a fast, iterative workflow. With SafetyKit, teams can test policies instantly on live and historical content, view real-time outcomes, and refine language in a continuous feedback loop. This allows them to respond to emerging risks immediately.This shift delivers major gains in speed, efficiency, and accuracy. A $10B global marketplace used SafetyKit to design and deploy a new PPE policy in just one week. The team tested and validated enforcement before launch, ensuring compliance with regulations and preventing disruptions across thousands of sellers.

Where are humans most important?

As AI systems cover routine enforcement, human judgment becomes even more critical in defining values, ensuring quality, and guiding complex decisions.

Expert oversight remains essential for translating platform values into policy, balancing risk, brand, and community priorities. As policy language increasingly demands automated enforcement, drafting clear, unambiguous rules has become an engineering discipline requiring domain expertise and technical precision.

Expanding enforcement requires rigorous quality oversight and expert review to ensure that automated decisions remain consistent with policy intent and human judgment.

Conclusion & learnings

LLM-powered systems now allow teams to apply context, precision, and consistency at scale while iterating policies from months to days.SafetyKit provides the infrastructure that makes this shift practical. Teams can test enforcement logic on real data, integrate regional and regulatory variations, and automate routine decisions with confidence that outcomes remain aligned with policy intent.Human expertise guides these systems and ensures automation follows platform standards. Together, people and models are building a faster, more adaptive trust and safety ecosystem that can respond to change in real time.

GET A DEMO
Thank you!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.